Skip to main content
'As the mother of a brown boy…' theatre performance
The front cover of the book, 'Death and Disorder'. The bright red cover contrasts with the black and white image of a police officer, with their face shield down pointing a gun. The title is in black font, underneath a brief description in white font.
'Death and Disorder' Published
The front cover of the book, 'Death in the City', contains a black and white image of a car. Pink arrows point to bullet holes in the car rear window. The title and the authors' names, Melissa Benn and Ken Worpole, are in pink font on the cover.
'Death in the City' published
The cover of the booklet has the text sat diagonal in different directions. Alongside is a sketch of a skeleton wearing uniform.
'Deaths at Work: Accidents or Corporate Crime' published
'Dying on the Inside' published
'In the Care of the State?' published
'Lobbying from Below' by Mick Ryan is published
'The Right to Life' published
'Unlocking The Truth' published
20-52 play about Leon Patterson at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe
Angiolini Review report published
Four campaigners stand in the icy weather holding posters that represent gravestones of people who died from self-inflicted deaths in prisons. The image is dated 12 February 1985.
Appointment of two paid London workers
Benjamin Zephaniah’s ‘The one minutes of silence' poem
Prison cell
Brixton: spotlighting horrific prison conditions
Benjamin Zephaniah sat recording into a microphone his Radio 4 appeal.
Charity appeal on BBC Radio 4 with Benjamin Zephaniah
Charity appeal on BBC Radio 4 with Linton Kwesi Johnson
Corston Report published
Family reflections on Grenfell published
First 'lack of care' verdict at an inquest into a self-inflicted death
Group of people standing, smiling
First INQUEST Family Forum
First INQUEST fringe meeting at Labour conference
First INQUEST Law magazine published
First INQUEST meeting
First UFFC procession
Gibraltar Shootings inquest
Gilly Singh Mundy dies
Harris Review report published
Red lights illuminate the St George's Hall Liverpool as the words 'Truth' and 'Justice' shine bright.
Hillsborough Football Disaster
Human Rights Act
INQUEST assists with Bishop James Jones's review of Hillsborough families' experiences
INQUEST Charitable Trust founded
INQUEST family support group starts up
Inquest into the Marchioness disaster begins
INQUEST is joint winner of the Human Rights Award
INQUEST Lawyers Group founded
INQUEST NORTHWEST set up
Learning from Death in Custody Inquests: A New Framework for Accountability
A black and white image of the front page of a Daily Mirror newspaper. The headline reads: 'Blind ship of death'
Marchioness Disaster
Non-means-tested legal aid for Article 2 inquests won
Seni's Law
Submission to Stephen Lawrence Inquiry
The Grenfell Tower fire
Our History

First 'lack of care' verdict at an inquest into a self-inflicted death

Jim Heather Hayes died by suicide aged 18 at Ashford Remand Centre on 7 July 1982. 

An inquest found that his death was due to 'lack of care'. This was a significant case, as it was the first time that a lack of care verdict had been accepted at an inquest into a self-inflicted death.

On 21 October 1982, the inquest found that the prison had failed to act on Jim's letters of distress that he sent home and failed to inform the prison governor, who then put Jim under solitary confinement.

This legal precedent shows a shifting understanding of accountaility, with 'lack of care' suggesting general liability, rather than pointing the finger at an individual. Marking a turn for lack of care verdicts, several similar verdicts were returned at inquests into prison and police custody deaths in 1983 and 1984. This made it easier for families and friends to campaign for action.

In 1983, there was an inquiry into Ashford Remand Centre and the inspector was highly critical of it.

Click below to read more about the Jim Heather-Hayes inquest, other lack of care verdicts and INQUEST's proposal for coronial reform in 1983. 

This really goes to the heart of what INQUEST is all about. We contend simply that if you lock someone up - deprive them of their liberty - for whatever reason in whatever circumstances, then you undertake a responsibility for their welfare. This seems to us a fundamental principle. No society which reneges upon that can long remain or be entitled to call itself civilised. 

INQUEST Annual Report, 1983-84